Connect with us


Courtroom Drama Unveils Controversial Presidential Election Results as INEC Chairman Dodges Subpoena – June 14



Courtroom Drama Unveils Controversial Presidential Election Results as INEC Chairman Dodges Subpoena – June 14, Court Proceedings

In a dramatic courtroom showdown, the Presidential Election Petition Court is currently embroiled in a heated battle over the authenticity of the Feb., 25 presidential election results in Nigeria. The court proceedings have shed light on the controversial actions of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and its chairman, Mahmood Yakubu. As the court examines the evidence presented by various sources, allegations of dodging subpoenas and the admission of disputed documents have further intensified the legal battle.

Courtroom Drama Unveils Controversial Election Results as INEC Chairman Dodges Subpoena - June 14, Court Proceedings
Courtroom Drama Unveils Controversial Presidential Election Results as INEC Chairman Dodges Subpoena – June 14, Court Proceedings

Obi and his Labour Party (LP) are the petitioners in the case labeled CA/PEPC/03/2023, contesting the election that led to Mr. Bola Tinubu’s assumption of power.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mr. Bola Tinubu, Vice-President Kashim Shettima, and the All Progressives Congress (APC) are the respondents in the lawsuit.

The courtroom drama began with a startling revelation from IRev, which presented disturbing results that put INEC in an embarrassing position. The documents, originating from Bauchi and many other states, were brought forth for scrutiny. While the the respondents objected these evidences, the court admitted them, and tagged them (the evidences) with Exhibit Numbers.

In an unexpected turn, INEC Chairman Mahmood Yakubu found himself at the center of the controversy. Dr. Livy Uzoukwu, lead counsel for the petitioners, accused Yakubu of consistently avoiding being served a subpoena, casting doubts on the integrity of INEC’s actions. Uzoukwu requested an adjournment, citing Yakubu’s alleged evasion of subpoenas as a major concern. However, INEC’s lawyer countered the claim, asserting that they had accepted all subpoenas served and accused Uzoukwu of misrepresentation.

The courtroom showdown reached a climax when it was announced that Mahmood Yakubu would finally appear before the Presidential Election Petition Court on Thursday. The anticipation surrounding Yakubu’s testimony adds further intrigue to the case, as it may hold critical evidence that could influence the outcome.

Throughout the court proceedings on June 14th, several key developments and contentious issues emerged. Here is a quick recap:

  1. LP’s Massive Collection of Evidence: The petitioners, LP, presented a substantial amount of evidence before the court. The evidence included IREV reports from various states, such as Benue, Niger, Edo, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Gombe, and Kaduna. These reports aimed to shed light on the election results and their authenticity.
  2. Objected Evidence: Despite the presentation of evidence, all respondents vigorously objected to the admission of the documents. It appears that there was significant contention regarding the validity and reliability of the presented materials. Nevertheless, the court made the decision to admit the evidence and assigned exhibit numbers to them.
  3. Blurred and Uncertain IREV Forms: One notable issue that arose during the proceedings was the presence of blurred IREV forms and documents that could not be linked to specific local government areas (LGAs). Respondents expressed their objections to these forms, raising concerns about their accuracy and legitimacy. However, the court admitted some of these blurred and uncertain IREV forms, further adding to the complexity of the case.
  4. Subpoena Dodging Allegations: Dr. Livy Uzoukwu, lead counsel for the petitioners, made serious allegations against INEC Chairman Mahmood Yakubu. Uzoukwu claimed that Yakubu consistently avoided being served a subpoena, implying that the INEC chairman was evading legal obligations. This accusation created a tense atmosphere in the courtroom and raised questions about the conduct of INEC officials.
  5. Court Adjournment: Given the contentious nature of the proceedings and the unresolved issues, an adjournment was requested. Dr. Uzoukwu requested the adjournment, citing Mahmood Yakubu’s alleged evasion of subpoenas as a primary concern. The court granted the request, adjourning the session until Thursday 15th June, 2023 by 9am.

The June 14th court proceedings revealed the intricate details of the case, including the presentation of a significant amount of evidence, objections from respondents, and allegations of subpoena dodging. As the court grapples with these complex matters, the final judgment and its implications for the presidential election remain uncertain.

As the court continues to unravel the tangled web of evidence and allegations, the future of the presidential election hangs in the balance. The admission of disputed documents and the controversy surrounding INEC’s chairman underscore the significance of the court’s decision. With each passing day, the courtroom drama intensifies, attracting nationwide attention and fueling public anticipation for a just and fair resolution to this unprecedented electoral dispute.

To catch up on the details of this case, stay connected to Reportera.

Oladiti Oluwajuwon is an experienced writer with 5+ years' expertise in captivating blog posts, articles (spiritual, educational, academic), and insightful news pieces. With a keen eye for detail, he specializes in diverse content, including political news and academic info such as degrees, schools, and admission requirements.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading