Connect with us


EXPOSED: Tinubu Exerts Pressure on the Judiciary to Sway Judgement in His Favour



In the heart of Nigeria’s legal battleground, a stirring revelation has emerged, sending shockwaves through the nation’s political landscape. ReporteraNews can now confirm that an unsettling cloud looms over the judiciary, where whispers of undue influence and mounting pressure have cast doubts on the sanctity of justice. Amidst the turmoil, one name emerges as the epicenter of controversy: Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the APC presidential candidate whose victory in the February 25, 2023, election was steeped in controversy following its contentious declaration by INEC.


As the nation grapples with this seismic revelation, ReporteraNews delves deep into the heart of the matter, seeking the truth behind the allegations of judicial sway, and uncovering a labyrinth of intrigue surrounding the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) judges in their pivotal role in determining the course of Nigeria’s democracy. Startling revelations point to the direct involvement of Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the APC presidential candidate, in attempts to sway the scales of justice in his favour. The air thickens with suspicion as whispers of Tinubu’s alleged attempts to exert undue influence and intimidation paint a disconcerting picture of the pursuit of truth and justice.

The 2023 Nigerian Presidential Election held on the 25th of February resulted in the declaration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the President of Nigeria. However, there has been widespread belief that the election was marred by electoral irregularities and allegations of rigging in favour of Tinubu. Two prominent figures, Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party, have contested the election results at the Presidential Election Petition Court.

Tinubu, Obi, and Atiku

The Five-Member Panel of the PEPC

The tribunal panel responsible for deciding the fate of the 2023 presidential election includes five esteemed judges. Justice Haruna Tsammani leads the panel. Other members of the panel include: Justice Stephen Adah (PJ of the Asaba division), Justice Monsurat O. Bolaji Yusuf (hailing from the Asaba division), Boloukuromo Moses Ugo (from the Kano division), and Justice Abba Mohammed (from the Ibadan division).

Tinubu Exerts Pressure on the Judiciary to Sway Judgement in His Favour
The Five-Member Panel of the PEPC

Rumours Making the Media Rounds: Alleged Judicial Influence and Resignation

In recent days, rumours surrounding the ongoing legal battle in the presidential election dispute have been swirling with intensity. One of the most concerning allegations is that Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the declared President of Nigeria, is attempting to wield influence over the outcome of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) case and is purportedly resorting to tactics of intimidation against the judges.

A Twitter user, Umar Sani, made a startling claim that Justice Ugo, a member of the five-man panel presiding over the case, resigned because he believed that ruling in favour of Tinubu against those challenging his electoral victory would pose a grave threat to Nigeria’s democracy. The alleged content of Justice Ugo’s resignation letter points to a troubling assertion that he was asked to compromise the independence of the judiciary by ruling in favour of a particular candidate, widely speculated to be Tinubu. The Court of Appeal later debunked the news, describing it as a fake news.

Renowned investigative journalist David Hundeyin also took to Twitter to share a screenshot of a message he received from a source he deems reliable, one that has never been known to provide untruthful information. The content of the message alleges a disconcerting development: “The president just rose from a meeting with the Gov Ozidinma, DG SSS, Chairman ICPC, and instructed to go after the Tribunal Judges and including the lawyers of Atiku and Peter Obi.”

Different rumours have surfaced on various media platforms, suggesting that Tinubu and his associates are employing questionable tactics to sway the judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Court in their favour. Hon. Rilwan, a notable commentator, aired these allegations on social media, claiming that Tinubu is allegedly using the Department of State Services (DSS) to intimidate the judges and exert pressure on them to submit their judgments to Chief Justice Ariwoola before rendering the final verdict. The goal is to obtain a favourable judgment that would favour Tinubu’s presidency.

ReporteraNews’ Confirmation of Allegations

ReporteraNews has undertaken a rigorous investigative effort to unravel the truth behind the allegations of judicial pressure in favour of Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Multiple and highly reliable sources from within the judiciary and the presidency have unveiled startling revelations that paint a concerning picture. These sources have confirmed the existence of a concerted effort by Tinubu and his henchmen to exert sinister influence over the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC). They are indeed mounting serious pressure on the tribunal judges through the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola, in an attempt to sway the judgment in their favour.

ReporteraNews also confirmed a deeply troubling development surrounding the ongoing legal battle. Our reliable sources from within the judiciary and the presidency have shed light on a concerted effort by Bola Ahmed Tinubu to exert influence over the outcome of the case. The evidence suggests that Tinubu is attempting to manipulate the judicial process through Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola, to secure a dismissal of certain cases related to the election dispute.

ReporteraNews can exclusively reveal that the pressure on the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) judges goes beyond mere influence, as shocking evidence indicates that they have been asked to submit their initial verdicts directly to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola. This clandestine request for review or re-evaluation of their judgments is believed to be a calculated move designed to tilt the scales of justice in favour of Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The mounting pressure on the tribunal to sway the judgment in Tinubu’s favour has ignited a firestorm of public scrutiny, raising grave doubts about the sanctity of the judicial process and the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

The Electoral Irregularities

Peter Obi emerged as a significant force in the 2023 election, gaining substantial support from the youth demographic and other parts of the population. Many Nigerians have refused to accept Tinubu as the legitimate president, referring to him as a mere placeholder or “INEC-declared president” when addressing him. This sentiment reflects the deep-rooted concerns over the fairness of the election and the legitimacy of Tinubu’s victory.

Tinubu’s Appeal to the Tribunal: Scared to Face Peter Obi?

During the ongoing legal battle surrounding the 2023 presidential election, a pivotal moment emerged when Bola Tinubu made an intriguing appeal to the justices of the Presidential Election Petition Court in Abuja. He urged them to exclude the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Mr. Peter Obi, and his party in the event of any rerun presidential election. Tinubu’s argument was based on the assertion that only he and the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, are constitutionally qualified to recontest, should the justices void the February 25, 2023, presidential election.

This appeal, however, sparked widespread speculation, raising a pertinent question: Could it be that Tinubu is apprehensive about facing Peter Obi, a candidate whom many or most Nigerians perceive as the rightful winner of the 2023 presidential election? The fact that Tinubu specifically requested to face only Atiku in a potential rerun has given rise to conjecture about the perceived strength and popularity of the Labour Party candidate.


The 2023 Nigerian Presidential Election has been mired in controversy, with allegations of electoral irregularities and undue pressure on the judiciary to sway the judgment in favour of Bola Ahmed Tinubu. In the midst of swirling rumours and conflicting reports that have captivated the nation, ReporteraNews stands as a beacon of truth and integrity, bringing to light the verified and reliable evidence obtained from sources within the judiciary and the presidency.

As the nation eagerly anticipates the verdict of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC), the spotlight remains firmly fixed on the sacred halls of justice, where the destiny of Nigeria’s democracy hangs in the balance. The very foundation of Nigeria’s democracy finds itself on trial. The outcome of this judicial crucible will not only determine the fate of the 2023 presidential election but will also leave an indelible mark on the nation’s history.

Amidst the cacophony of rumours and claims of pressure, it is imperative that the judiciary stands firm, impervious to influence, and resolute in its pursuit of truth. Nigeria watches with bated breath as the scales of justice tip, hoping that the resolution will herald a new era of transparency, fairness, and true representation of the people’s will. For now, the nation waits, hopeful yet cautious, as the spotlight shines brightly on the crucible of the judiciary, where the fate of the nation hangs in balance.

With the weight of public trust and the future of the judiciary resting upon their shoulders, the PEPC judges face an arduous task, charged with upholding the principles of justice, safeguarding the constitution, and preserving the spirit of democracy. With unwavering commitment to unbiased reporting, ReporteraNews continues its mission to safeguard the truth and uphold the principles of a transparent and accountable democracy.

Follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews for more updates.

Oladiti Oluwajuwon is an experienced writer with 5+ years' expertise in captivating blog posts, articles (spiritual, educational, academic), and insightful news pieces. With a keen eye for detail, he specializes in diverse content, including political news and academic info such as degrees, schools, and admission requirements.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading