Connect with us


INEC’s Credibility Crisis Unveiled: Judges Powerless to Force Document Production, June 20 Proceedings



INEC’s Credibility Crisis Unveiled: Judges Powerless to Force Document Production

In a riveting court session on Tuesday, the judges made it explicitly clear to Dr Livy Uzoukwu SAN, leading counsel for the petitioners, that there is nothing they can do to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to produce crucial documents, apart from the subpoena. This revelation in the courtroom raises questions about the authenticity of the documents on which the election results were based.

INEC's Credibility Crisis Unveiled: Judges Powerless to Force Document Production

While the judges may be limited in their power to force document production, it is suggestive that there might be credibility crisis surrounding INEC. The open court proceedings shed light on this crisis.

It is crucial to remember that INEC will be calling its own witnesses who will rely on documents. However, their case may be severely weakened if they fail to tender all the relevant documents. This raises concerns about the source and validity of the documents on which INEC relied to announce the election results.

Furthermore, the principle of adverse inference, firmly rooted in law, suggests that the documents INEC is attempting to conceal could potentially be detrimental to their defense. This further adds to the skepticism surrounding INEC’s actions and raises suspicions about the transparency and fairness of the electoral process.

While some may question the judges’ actions, it is important to note that they are blameless in this situation. They are diligently carrying out their duties, leading INEC through the judicial process. The judges’ role is to ensure that justice is served, and they can only do that within the constraints of law.

In the cross-examinations that involves key witnesses, including an AWS Cloud Engineer, focus was on technical aspects, such as glitches and the responsibility of AWS in ensuring the security and performance of its services. The witness provided insights into the AWS infrastructure used by INEC, highlighting the significance of accessing different reports to understand the applications deployed on the infrastructure fully.

Amidst the intense questioning, it was revealed that the witness herself had a personal history as a candidate for the Labor Party (LP). This raised some doubts about her impartiality, but she clarified that she was present in court as an expert witness and not on the mandate of Amazon or as an LP activist.

The cross-examinations continued with other respondents’ counsels, each aiming to challenge the witness’s credibility and the authenticity of the documents she presented.

In a critical turn of events, INEC was subpoenaed to produce specific documents. However, during the court session, INEC’s representative informed the court that some of the requested documents do not exist, while others are still pending for logistical reasons. This revelation infuriated the petitioners’ counsel, who argued that INEC’s failure to comply with the subpoena is unfair and demanded that all documents be produced before the close of their case.

AB Mahmood SAN, citing section 74 of the Electoral Act, deemed the demand for INEC to produce all the requested documents impracticable, leading to a heated debate in the courtroom.

With tensions escalating and the court adjourned until the following day, the focus shifts to the way forward. The petitioners seek the court’s intervention to compel INEC to produce the missing documents, while the respondents attempt to defend their position, citing legal limitations.

As the proceedings continue, it becomes increasingly evident that the outcome of this case holds significant implications for INEC’s credibility and the integrity of the electoral process. The judges are committed to upholding justice, but the obstacles in obtaining crucial documents highlight the challenges faced in the pursuit of truth and fairness.

To stay updated with the latest developments surrounding this story, we encourage you to remain connected to the Politics section of our website. Additionally, you can also follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews to access further insights and updates. Stay connected to ensure you don’t miss any crucial information regarding this topic.

Oladiti Oluwajuwon is an experienced writer with 5+ years' expertise in captivating blog posts, articles (spiritual, educational, academic), and insightful news pieces. With a keen eye for detail, he specializes in diverse content, including political news and academic info such as degrees, schools, and admission requirements.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading