Connect with us

Politics

LP and Peter Obi Present Overwhelming Evidence in Intense Court Proceedings

Published

on

In a high-stakes court battle between Peter Obi, representing the Labour Party (LP), and his opponents Tinubu, Shettima, and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the proceedings took an interesting turn. The court session, expertly handled by PIN Ikwueto, continued with the cross-examination of Professor Eric Ufoedu from Nnamdi Azikwe University (NAU).

Nigeria's Uncertain Destiny: Peter Obi Calls for a Credible Electoral System
Nigeria’s Uncertain Destiny: Peter Obi Calls for a Credible Electoral System Image source: https://saharareporters.com/

AB Mahmood, representing INEC, questioned Prof. Eric about his whereabouts on election day, to which the witness replied that he was at his polling unit and cast his vote. AB Mahmood inquired about Prof. Eric’s role in producing the election result, to which he stated that he was requested to produce it but was not paid for his services. The witness affirmed that he acted as a patriotic Nigerian.

AB Mahmood focused on the primary source of Prof. Eric’s data, the IREV portal. The witness confirmed that the EC8A forms and reports uploaded on the portal were his reference points. However, he also mentioned the existence of blurred images of EC8A forms on the portal. AB Mahmood sought clarification on whether the physical copies of the EC8A forms were also blurred, but Prof. Eric admitted that he did not see the physical copies.

During the cross-examination, Olujimi Akin, counsel for the second and third respondents (Tinubu and Shettima), delved into the process of collating election results. The witness confirmed that votes were cast at polling units, recorded on EC8A forms, and later transmitted to the IREV portal. Prof. Eric also acknowledged that the IREV portal was not a collation center itself but a platform for uploading EC8A forms.

Abiodun Owonikoko, representing the fourth respondent (APC), questioned the expertise of Prof. Eric in conducting statistical analysis. The witness admitted that his report did not involve complex mathematics and could have been calculated by someone with basic mathematical knowledge. However, he stood by the importance of analyzing the EC8A forms, which were the primary source of his report.

The cross-examination of Prof. Eric concluded, and the court moved on to the next witness, Lumie Idevbie from Arise TV. During her cross-examination, it was established that she was an experienced broadcaster and familiar with computer platforms. The witness confirmed the distinction between transfer and transmission and stated that the content broadcasted on Arise TV could be accessed by viewers within the transmission zone.

The court then called Ijeoma, a staff member of AIT, as the third witness. She confirmed being subpoenaed and deposing to a Witness Statement Under Oath (WSOO). During her cross-examination, it was revealed that she anchored a program that included a flash drive containing relevant content. The flash drive was later played in court, and objections from the respondents were overruled.

The court proceedings emphasized Peter Obi’s overwhelming evidence, particularly the analysis of the EC8A forms, which were central to the case. Prof. Eric’s expertise in scrutinizing these forms and the discrepancies found in the blurred images provided crucial evidence supporting Peter Obi’s claim to reclaim his mandate. As the court battle continued, it became evident that the evidence presented by Peter Obi and LP could significantly influence the outcome of the case in their favor.

Christian Maximilian, a Software Engineer with an unwavering love for writing, has transformed his passion into a full-time profession as a Political Analyst. Combining technical expertise with creative flair, he crafts compelling stories that bridge the worlds of politics and literature.

Continue Reading

Politics

African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest

Published

on

In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading

Politics

Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”

Published

on

In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading

Politics

Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery

Published

on

Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading

Trending