Peter Obi: Subsidy Is a Criminal Setup



In a recent Twitter space hosted by Parallel Facts Media Organization, former Nigerian politician Peter Obi shared his strong conviction that the fuel subsidy system in Nigeria was a criminal setup. Joined by several other Nigerians, he elaborated on his concerns and presented reasons for his stance. Notably, he referred to a recent statement by former Governor of Bauchi State, Isa Yuguda, who also condemned the subsidy system, shedding light on the scale of corruption and financial exploitation associated with it.

Interestingly, the current administration had already removed the subsidy, resulting in widespread hardship and economic challenges for the masses. When questioned about what he would have done differently to alleviate the pain experienced by the people, Obi responded with a plan that would have employed a different approach to mitigate the adverse effects on the population.

Peter Obi: Subsidy Is a Criminal Setup

Peter Obi’s Views on the Criminal Nature of Subsidy

During the Twitter space discussion, Peter Obi firmly stated that the fuel subsidy in Nigeria was a crime that needed to be addressed. He commended Governor Isa Yuguda for openly discussing a friend’s confession about being “tired of making money” from the subsidy. The gravity of this statement resonated deeply with Obi, further solidifying his conviction that the system needed to be dismantled.

Comparative Analysis: Nigeria vs. Pakistan

To illustrate the magnitude of the problem, Peter Obi compared Nigeria’s fuel consumption to that of Pakistan, a country with a similar population. He pointed out that despite having more extensive road networks, Nigeria consumes twice as much fuel as Pakistan. This comparison raised concerns about the accuracy and legitimacy of the subsidy claims, indicating that a considerable portion of the funds allocated for subsidy might be misused or embezzled.

Proposed Solutions

Peter Obi offered a pragmatic approach to resolving the issue of fuel subsidy in Nigeria. He mentioned some of the approaches he would have employed:

  1. Reduce Subsidy by 50%: If he were in a position of power, Obi would implement an immediate 50% reduction in the existing fuel subsidy. This move would create room to assess the actual impact of the subsidy and identify the potential for misuse.
  2. Eliminate the Criminal Component: After the initial reduction, Obi advocated for a thorough investigation into the criminal activities surrounding the subsidy. He emphasized that all parties involved in fraudulent practices should be held accountable for their actions.
  3. He also expressed his desire to collaborate with repentant beneficiaries of the subsidy scam, like Governor Yuguda’s friend, to address the issue effectively. He emphasized the need to rectify the criminal aspects of the subsidy, which have caused enormous financial losses for Nigeria.

Utilizing Saved Funds for Development

A critical aspect of Peter Obi’s proposition is the allocation of saved funds to crucial developmental projects. By eliminating wasteful subsidies and curbing corruption, Obi believed that Nigeria could redirect substantial financial resources toward projects that benefit the masses. These funds could be channeled into improving infrastructure, education, healthcare, and other key areas of development.

Ex-Governor Isa Yuguda’s Confession

Obi’s views align with those of former Governor Isa Yuguda, who openly criticized the subsidy system during an interview on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily. Yuguda echoed Obi’s sentiments, labeling the subsidy as a scam that benefited only a few individuals while plunging the nation into financial hardship.

Yuguda recounted an incident when a friend in the oil industry urged the president at the time to stop the subsidy, citing that they were “tired of making money” from it. This revelation further exposed the extent of corruption within the subsidy system.


The Twitter space hosted by Parallel Facts Media Organization provided a platform for Peter Obi to voice his concerns about the criminal nature of the fuel subsidy system in Nigeria. While the current administration had already removed the fuel subsidy, the aftermath resulted in widespread hardship and economic challenges for Nigerians. In the Twitter space discussion, Peter Obi offered an alternative approach to address the issue.

By implementing reductions and investigating fraudulent practices, Nigeria could potentially redirect substantial funds toward critical areas of development, ultimately benefiting the nation and its people. Although some level of hardship would have been unavoidable as stated by Peter Obi, his proposed plan aimed to reduce the burden on the people and ensure a more efficient and equitable transition away from the subsidy system.

Follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews for more updates.


Exit mobile version