Connect with us


Presidential Election Court Case: Intense Legal Showdown Unfolds – June 15 Proceedings



In a high-stakes court case challenging the outcome of the presidential election, the Labour Party (LP) has taken the electoral battle to the courtroom. The case, labeled CA/PEPC/03/2023, involves the LP as the petitioner and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Bola Tinubu, Kashim Shettima, and the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the respondents. With tensions running high and a star witness on the stand, the court proceedings have become a spectacle of legal fireworks.

Presidential Election Court Case
Presidential Election Court Case

The courtroom was abuzz with anticipation as the LP’s legal team, led by Dr. Livy Uzoukwu, prepared to present their case. Representing the petitioners, Peter Obi made a striking entrance, announcing himself as part of the legal council. The stage was set for an intense battle of legal arguments and evidence.

Respondents Object to Witness Testimony

The first witness, Prof Eric Uwadiegwu Ofoedu, a mathematics professor at Nnamdi Azikiwe University in Awka, took the stand. However, the respondents’ counsels objected, claiming they had been served the witness statement only moments before the proceedings began. They argued that this was an ambush and requested more time to review the documents.

Court Decides on Examination in Chief and Cross-Examination

While the respondents’ counsels objected, LP’s counsel argued for the examination in chief to proceed, deferring the cross-examination to a later time. The court ultimately ruled that the star witness would be examined in chief, with the cross-examination scheduled for tomorrow.

Examination in Chief Continues

The examination in chief continued, with Prof Eric Uwadiegwu Ofoedu answering questions about his occupation, place of residence, and the subpoena he received to testify. The respondents’ counsels objected to the admission of the witness statement, but LP’s counsel argued that the witness had complied with the requirements of the court rules.

Objections and Admissions of Documents

The objections and counter-arguments flew back and forth, creating a chorus of objections around the tendering of the witness statement. Despite the objections, the court recognized the unique circumstances and admitted the witness statement as evidence.

Humorous Observations in the Courtroom

As the proceedings unfolded, the courtroom was inundated with a massive collection of evidence presented by the LP., causing shock and amusement among the attendees. Even the judges couldn’t help but laugh at the sheer volume of evidence presented.

One notable piece of evidence presented by the LP was 18,088 blurred polling unit result sheets. The magnitude of the evidence left the INEC lawyers stunned, and the courtroom erupted in laughter at the sight of the massive amount of documentation.

Summary of Evidence Presented by the Labour Party

The LP’s legal team, led by Dr. Livy Uzoukwu and PIN Ikwueto SAN, continued to present their witnesses and evidence. The court admitted various documents, including the witness’s subpoena, a letter of engagement from the LP, and a flash drive containing video recordings.

Adjournment and Summary of Proceedings

The courtroom proceedings concluded for the day, with the promise of cross-examination tomorrow. The atmosphere in the courtroom was electric, with expectations running high for the continuation of the legal showdown.

Here is a quick recap:

  • Court proceedings began at approximately 9:40 am.
  • The Labour Party (LP) presented a massive collection of evidence and brought two HD TVs to play videos.
  • HE Peter Obi represented the petitioners.
  • Dr. Livy Uzoukwu SAN led LP’s counsel, and Onyechi Ikpeazu SAN and PIN Ikwueto SAN led the proceedings.
  • The first witness for the day was Prof Eric Uwadiegwu Ofoedu, a professor of Mathematics from Nnamdi Azikiwe University.
  • The respondents objected to the examination of the witness, stating they were served with the witness statement that morning.
  • The court decided that the witness would be examined in chief but cross-examined the following day at 9 am.
  • The examination in chief of the witness was completed, but objections were raised regarding the adoption of the witness statement.
  • LP attempted to make corrections to the witness statement under oath, but objections were raised by the respondents.
  • The court admitted and tagged the documents presented by the witness as Exhibits PCG1-3.
  • LP sought to tender a letter and subpoena from the second petitioner to the witness, which was objected to by the respondents.
  • The court admitted and tagged the subpoena as Exhibit PCF1 and the letter as Exhibit PCF2.
  • The examination in chief for the chief witness concluded, and cross-examination was scheduled for the following day.
  • The court called another witness, Lumie Idevbie, who worked at Arise News TV.
  • The witness confirmed receiving a subpoena addressed to their organization.
  • The court admitted the subpoena as Exhibit PCG without objections from the respondents.
  • The witness’s ID card was also admitted as Exhibit PCG1.
  • The witness adopted their written witness statement on oath, which was objected to by the respondents.
  • The witness also had a flash drive containing video recordings, which was admitted as Exhibit PCG2.
  • The court adjourned the proceedings to the following day, June 16th, at 9 am.

As the court case unfolds, the world waits to see the outcome and understand the implications for the presidential election. With the magnitude of evidence presented by the LP, questions are raised about the credibility of the election results and the role of INEC. The battle in the courtroom is far from over, and all eyes are on the judges who hold the power to determine the fate of the disputed election.

Discover Reportera’s insightful post on the June 14 court proceedings, providing you with a comprehensive understanding of the case. Read it here to stay informed about this significant legal development.

Oladiti Oluwajuwon is an experienced writer with 5+ years' expertise in captivating blog posts, articles (spiritual, educational, academic), and insightful news pieces. With a keen eye for detail, he specializes in diverse content, including political news and academic info such as degrees, schools, and admission requirements.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading