Connect with us


Tinubu and APC Begs for Re-run Amidst Calls to Disqualify Tinubu



In an unforeseen twist of events, the candidacy of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) is facing a tumultuous challenge as supporters of the party take to the streets in various cities across Nigeria, fervently urging that Tinubu not be disqualified from the presidential race. However, their plea faces significant hurdles, as courts are confronted with a substantial body of evidence that could potentially lead to Tinubu’s dismissal and removal from the electoral process. This comprehensive article delves into the key points of contention surrounding Tinubu’s eligibility, examining the intricacies of issues such as dual citizenship, alleged involvement in drug-related activities, electoral performance, and accusations of perjury.

  1. Dual Citizenship Question:

One of the primary concerns that have come to light is the alleged dual citizenship of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu. It has been claimed that Tinubu possesses a Guinean diplomat passport, indicating that he may be a citizen of both Guinea and Nigeria. This alleged dual citizenship poses a direct challenge to Tinubu’s eligibility to run for the office of the president in Nigeria, as the country’s constitution expressly prohibits individuals with dual citizenship from seeking the highest office. If proven true, the penalty for such an infringement is outright disqualification and sack by the courts as the president.

The issue of dual citizenship in Nigeria has been a subject of controversy and legal scrutiny in previous political cases. Courts have consistently emphasized the significance of candidates’ loyalty and allegiance solely to Nigeria when running for the presidency, making the burden of proof critical in establishing Tinubu’s eligibility.

  1. Forfeiture of Proceeds from Drug Business:

Another significant aspect of the contention surrounding Tinubu’s eligibility stems from allegations that he forfeited a substantial amount of money to the United States government in the early 1990s due to alleged involvement in drug-related activities. Forfeiture, in this context, refers to the loss of property without compensation as a penalty for illegal conduct, including drug-related offenses.

While the details of the specific incident remain disputed, the mere existence of these allegations raises serious doubts about Tinubu’s suitability for the presidential office. The recent refusal by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to release documents related to this matter only serves to intensify the suspicions and speculations surrounding Tinubu’s past.

  1. Electoral Performance in FCT:

Tinubu’s electoral performance in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, during the last election has also been called into question. The Nigerian constitution stipulates that for a presidential candidate to be declared the winner, they must secure at least 25% of the votes in all 36 states, as well as in the FCT. However, in the last election, Tinubu only managed to secure 19% of the total votes in the FCT.

This discrepancy raises concerns about whether Tinubu meets the constitutional threshold for becoming the president of Nigeria. Past legal precedents, such as the 2003 election between Buhari and Obasanjo, indicate that courts have ruled in favor of candidates who obtained the required 25% in the FCT, even if they did not secure the most votes overall. As a result, the outcome of Tinubu’s case may hinge on the interpretation of these constitutional provisions and the application of past rulings.

  1. Allegations of Perjury:

Tinubu’s academic records, submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), have also come under scrutiny. Despite his sworn affirmation that these records exist, their verification remains pending. This situation raises concerns of perjury – the act of providing false information while under oath. If proven, perjury could be grounds for an outright disqualification from the presidential race.

The escalating controversy surrounding Asiwaju Bola Tinubu’s eligibility for the presidential race has thrown Nigerian politics into a state of uncertainty. Supporters of Tinubu and the APC are fervently urging that he not be disqualified, but the weight of the evidence presented before the courts cannot be ignored. The dual citizenship question, allegations of involvement in drug-related activities, electoral performance, and accusations of perjury create a complex web of legal challenges that must be meticulously examined by the judiciary.

Amidst the mountainous evidence presented before the courts, both Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) find themselves in a precarious position, fervently pleading for a rerun of the election instead of an outright disqualification. The weight of the evidence against them has led them to consider this alternative, hoping for a chance to rectify any perceived shortcomings and regain their standing in the electoral process.

The nation watches with bated breath as the judiciary prepares to deliver its ruling, fully aware of the immense significance of this decision. The outcome of the court’s deliberation will not only determine Tinubu’s fate in the presidential race but could also have far-reaching ramifications for Nigeria’s broader political landscape.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with the evolving political landscape of Nigeria. You can also read a related article here.

Christian Maximilian, a Software Engineer with an unwavering love for writing, has transformed his passion into a full-time profession as a Political Analyst. Combining technical expertise with creative flair, he crafts compelling stories that bridge the worlds of politics and literature.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading