Connect with us


Tinubu Threatens Anarchy on Page 30 of His Final Address



Tinubu has firmly responded to the petitions filed by Mr. Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP) and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) seeking the nullification of his victory in the presidential election held on February 25. Tinubu expressed strong concerns that nullifying the election based on his alleged failure to secure 25% of the lawful votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) could result in chaos, absurdity, anarchy, and a distortion of the legislature’s original intent.

The detailed written address presented by Tinubu’s legal team to the Presidential Election Petition Court (PREPEC) highlighted the novel nature of the two petitions, emphasizing that they deviated from the usual complaints of election rigging, violence, voter intimidation, and other electoral vices. The defense argued that the petitions were not in accordance with the country’s electoral laws and lacked familiarity with established legal principles.

The five-member panel, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani, had granted the respondents, including Tinubu, Shettima, and the All Progressive Congress (APC), ten days to submit their written addresses, while the petitioners were given seven days to respond. The respondents concluded their defense after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had already closed its case.

Both Atiku and Obi, along with their respective parties, contested INEC’s declaration of Tinubu and the APC as the winners of the presidential election. They sought various reliefs, including the nullification of Tinubu’s victory based on allegations that INEC failed to adhere to the guidelines and regulations for conducting the 2023 general elections and relevant electoral laws.

According to INEC’s Chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, Tinubu secured 8,794,726 votes, while Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi obtained 6,984,520 votes and 6,101,533 votes, respectively. The petitioners challenged these figures, arguing that the collation of results was still ongoing when Tinubu was declared the winner. They also claimed that Tinubu did not achieve the required 25% of the lawful votes in the FCT.

Additionally, the petitioners raised concerns about Tinubu’s eligibility, referring to an alleged United States District Court judgment ordering the forfeiture of $460,000 suspected to be proceeds of drug trafficking. They further alleged that Shettima’s double nomination as both a senatorial candidate for the APC in Borno Central and as Tinubu’s running mate violated the electoral laws.

During the course of the proceedings, Atiku called 27 witnesses, including INEC’s Presiding Officers and experts, while Obi presented 13 witnesses and numerous documents, including over 18,000 blurred result sheets used by INEC to declare Tinubu as the winner. The respondents, including INEC, Tinubu, and the APC, challenged the credibility of the witnesses and documents, urging the court to disregard them.

In their final written address, Tinubu, Shettima, and the APC argued that the grounds on which the petitions were based were unfamiliar with the country’s electoral laws. They highlighted that the petitions primarily focused on alleged non-transmission of results to the INEC Election Result Viewing (IREV) Portal and Tinubu’s failure to score 25% of the votes in the FCT.

Tinubu’s legal team contended that the FCT should be considered as the 37th state, in accordance with the Constitution, and argued that any interpretation contrary to this would lead to absurdity and chaos. They emphasized that all votes and voters are equal, regardless of the state they originate from. They referred to previous court decisions and constitutional provisions to support their argument.

Moreover, Tinubu’s defense addressed the issue of electronic transmission of results. They argued that the law recognizes both electronic and manual transmission, and the evidence presented by the petitioners’ witnesses did not sufficiently challenge the accuracy of polling unit results. Tinubu’s team stressed that the petitioners failed to provide substantial evidence to warrant the nullification of the election.

Regarding the alleged US forfeiture proceedings, Tinubu’s legal team pointed out that the petitioners’ witnesses did not provide evidence mentioning a “fine” in the documents submitted. They also highlighted procedural issues, such as the lack of registration of the foreign judgment in Nigeria, in line with legal requirements.

In conclusion, Tinubu’s legal team urged the court to dismiss the petitions, asserting that they lacked merit, substance, and good faith. They emphasized the peaceful and fair conduct of the election and the absence of evidence supporting the allegations of electoral irregularities. Tinubu’s team also requested the court to consider adding the discounted votes from Kano State, which would increase Tinubu’s overall vote count.

For more up-to-date news content, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews

Christian Maximilian, a Software Engineer with an unwavering love for writing, has transformed his passion into a full-time profession as a Political Analyst. Combining technical expertise with creative flair, he crafts compelling stories that bridge the worlds of politics and literature.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading