Connect with us


“Wole Soyinka Lacks Home Training” — Jimoh



Wole Soyinka – In the realm of human discourse, where ideas and beliefs intertwine, controversies often arise like tempestuous storms, stirring emotions and igniting fervent debates. Such is the case surrounding the celebrated Nigerian playwright and Nobel laureate, Wole Soyinka, who now finds himself engulfed in the fiery embers of a polarizing dispute. His weapon of choice: a meticulously crafted letter addressed to the esteemed Emir of Ilorin, HRH Alh. Dr. Ibrahim Sulu Gambari, CFR.

The subject of contention emerges from the ashes of a canceled Isese festival, a cultural endeavor set forth by the enigmatic Christian prophetess and acclaimed Osun priestess, Omolara Olatunji, known to the masses as Yeye Ajesikemi. As this intellectual whirlwind unfolds, let us delve into the intricate layers of this controversy and explore the disparate perspectives that have converged upon this ethereal stage.

Critics, including Alhaji LAK Jimoh, a respected Ilorin-born historian, and Imam Ismail Dare Olawuwo, an Islamic scholar, have taken turns to criticize Soyinka for his lack of religious tolerance. They argue that as an atheist and a proponent of cultism in the Nigerian educational system, he lacks the moral authority to speak on matters of religious tolerance.

LAK Jimoh, while expressing his desire for a more organized response to Soyinka’s letter, highlighted his grievances with the title of the letter itself. Referring to it as “Open letter to SULU GAMBARI” without the courtesy of addressing the Emir as Alhaji Ibrahim Sulu-Gambari, Jimoh accuses Soyinka of displaying a lack of home training and respect.

Moreover, Jimoh contends that Soyinka’s references to inter-religious disharmony in Kaduna, Boko Haram, and ISWAP are a deliberate attempt to incite disruption in the traditionally tranquil Ilorin Emirate, known for its ethno-cultural tolerance and inter-religious harmony.

Jimoh goes further to criticize Soyinka’s past involvement in cultism during his undergraduate years and even accuses him of being a failed assassin in the 1960s. According to Jimoh, individuals like Soyinka, who have perpetuated destructive cultism in Nigeria, should feel ashamed and have no moral ground to sermonize about tolerance. He argues that Soyinka’s previous intolerance towards dissenting political opinions undermines any credibility he may have on the subject.

Continuing his critique, Jimoh challenges Soyinka’s intellectualism and suggests that if he wishes to engage in a debate, he should familiarize himself with the history of various Yoruba towns and the trajectory of their respective dynasties. Jimoh mentions examples like Ife, Oyo, Ibadan, Abeokuta, Osogbo, and Modakeke, highlighting instances where certain groups displaced others to establish their dominance.

Imam Ismail Dare Olawuwo, in a similar vein, questions Soyinka’s right to discuss religious tolerance due to his atheism. Olawuwo asserts that the Emir of Ilorin, as the custodian and protector of the city, has the moral authority to intervene and cancel events such as the Isese festival. Ilorin, being a predominantly Muslim community deeply influenced by Islamic teachings, values peace, unity, and respect for others as crucial elements for peaceful coexistence.

The responses from LAK Jimoh and Imam Ismail Dare Olawuwo reflect the strong sentiments against Wole Soyinka’s letter, criticizing his lack of religious tolerance and calling into question his moral standing. As this controversy unfolds, the city of Ilorin eagerly awaits Soyinka’s response, suggesting that those who live in glass houses should think twice before casting stones.

For the latest news and articles, visit Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter:

Christian Maximilian, a Software Engineer with an unwavering love for writing, has transformed his passion into a full-time profession as a Political Analyst. Combining technical expertise with creative flair, he crafts compelling stories that bridge the worlds of politics and literature.

Continue Reading


African Union Takes Action: Republic of Niger Suspended Amidst Political Unrest



In a decisive move that reverberated across the continent, the African Union (AU) announced the suspension of the Republic of Niger from its membership ranks.

This momentous decision was unveiled during the African Union’s Peace and Security Council meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on Tuesday, August 22.

African Union:Picture Source- Pinterest

The suspension stems from the recent political turmoil that engulfed the nation, with the African Union pointing to the coup orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani on Wednesday, July 26. As part of a series of sanctions imposed on the francophone West African country, the Republic of Niger faced the repercussions of its internal upheaval.

The African Union’s stance was uncompromising, as it made it clear that Western nations seeking to meddle in African affairs should refrain from interfering. This firm message was directed from the heart of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where the AU’s call for autonomy echoed loudly.

The events leading up to Niger’s suspension unfolded against a backdrop of political uncertainty and unrest. The coup in Niger, orchestrated by Gen Abdourahamane Tchiani, prompted the Afican Union to take action. Their decision to suspend Niger was not taken lightly and was ratified during the Peace and Security Council meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on August 22.

The aftermath of the military takeover in left President Mohamed Bazoum in captivity, held under the close watch of the juntas in Niger. Despite international pressure, the release of the president and his family remains elusive. This tense situation compelled the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene, imposing sanctions on Niger and establishing a deadline for the initiation of military intervention by the sub-regional body’s standby forces.

The suspension of the Republic of Niger from the African Union serves as a stark reminder of the continent’s commitment to upholding stability and safeguarding democratic governance. The swift response underscores the African Union’s dedication to maintaining order and security within its member states, sending a resounding message to the global community about the importance of respecting Africa’s sovereignty.

Continue Reading


Peter Obi: “I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria”



In a recent tweet that has caught the attention of many, @MissPearls shares an inspiring declaration made by former Anambra state governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi. According to @MissPearls, Peter Obi proclaimed, “I campaigned for Presidency because I can say it any day, I Will SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF NIGERIA. All these confusion everywhere can BE SOLVED, and I am PREPARED for it”

Peter Obi: I Campaigned For Presidency Because I Can Say It Any Day, I Will Solve The Problem Of Nigeria.

Peter Obi’s bid for the presidency in the recent elections stirred considerable excitement and garnered support from diverse quarters, particularly the youth demographic. The former governor is known for his progressive ideas and pragmatic approach to governance, which resonated with many Nigerians who sought change and effective solutions to the country’s myriad challenges.

Despite his extensive support and well-articulated vision, Peter Obi’s presidential ambitions faced formidable opponents in the election. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) released results that placed him behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who emerged as the winner, and Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came second. However, these results were met with skepticism due to apparent electoral irregularities that marred the integrity of the process.

In response to the controversial election outcome, both Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar filed legal challenges against the INEC’s declaration. This move underscores their commitment to upholding the democratic process and ensuring that the voice of the electorate is accurately reflected. As the election Tribunal Judges prepare to deliver their verdict, Nigeria watches with bated breath, eager to witness justice being served.

Meanwhile, the administration of Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu has taken significant policy actions since assuming office. The removal of fuel subsidies and the decision to float the Naira have triggered mixed reactions across the nation. While these measures may be intended to foster economic stability and growth, the immediate consequences have been felt by everyday Nigerians. The cost of living has surged, and the socio-economic effects on the rich and the poor have become more pronounced.

As the Nigerian population navigates these shifts, the aftermath of the election and the ensuing governance strategies offer a critical juncture for evaluating the nation’s trajectory. The voices of discontent, expressed by citizens facing the brunt of these policies, highlight the necessity for leaders to prioritize the well-being of the populace while pursuing economic advancements. It is essential for the government to strike a balance between fiscal prudence and safeguarding the interests of the vulnerable segments of society.

The policy changes implemented by Bola Tinubu have shed light on the delicate balance between progress and the welfare of the people. As the nation waits for the tribunal’s judgment and the dust settles on the recent election, Nigeria stands at a crossroads, with the potential to reshape its future trajectory and address the systemic challenges that have held it back for far too long.

Fore more updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporteraNews.

Continue Reading


Youths in Kano Defy Police Ban to Protest Alleged Tribunal Bribery



Hundreds of determined youths in Kano took to the streets, defying a police ban, to protest what they perceive as attempts to manipulate the state election petition tribunal. This incident unfolded against the backdrop of a ban on protests by the Commissioner of Police, Usuani Gumel, following revelations of alleged plots to obstruct justice through financial inducement in legal proceedings.

Youths in kano

The rally, which unfolded outside the state government house, saw impassioned youths brandishing placards with messages that underscored their commitment to justice and the integrity of the electoral process. Their actions were sparked by concerns over an alleged plan to bribe the state election petition tribunal, casting a shadow over the fairness of the process.

The ban on protests was issued in response to recent revelations made by Justice Flora Azinge, who unveiled purported schemes by lawyers to disrupt the course of justice through financial incentives. The Commissioner of Police cited “confirmatory intelligence products” as the basis for this decision, leaving a contentious atmosphere surrounding the freedom of assembly and the right to peaceful protest.

This ban, however, failed to deter the resolute youths who carried a variety of placards conveying their strong stance against corruption, manipulation, and injustice. The slogans they chanted resonated with their determination to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process and uphold transparency in governance.

Among the messages displayed, one placard caught the eye with its direct callout: “Gandollar, stop spoiling the name of Tinubu.” This highlights the allegation that financial impropriety is tainting the reputation of key political figures.

In a video circulated online, the enthusiastic protesters chanted slogans that echoed their deep-seated concerns. Chants of “No to corruption,” “No to injustice,” and “No to manipulation” reverberated through the crowd, embodying the youth’s unwavering commitment to fair and accountable governance.

Addressing the gathering, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf praised the peaceful conduct of the protesters and assured them that their concerns would be relayed to President Bola Tinubu. This gesture recognizes the role of the youth in shaping political discourse and underscores the importance of their voices in the pursuit of a just society.

In conclusion, the youths in Kano have seized the moment to voice their concerns and demands for an unbiased electoral process. Their defiance of the police ban serves as a reminder that public sentiment cannot be easily suppressed. As this incident unfolds, it raises important questions about the delicate balance between freedom of assembly, legitimate protest, and maintaining public order. It also underscores the critical role of the youth in shaping the political landscape and demanding accountability from their leaders.

For the latest news updates, follow us on Twitter @ReporterNews. Stay informed and engaged with evolving stories from all around the world.

Continue Reading